Opinion
State must give counties a break on Medicaid costs
It’s past time for North Carolina lawmakers to relieve counties of the burden of paying part of the expense of Medicaid. Medicaid costs saddle counties with an ever-growing expenditure over which they have absolutely no control.
The amount and kind of coverage North Carolina residents receive is mandated by the state, chosen from options made available by the federal government, which pays 60 percent of the cost.
Almost all other states pay the remaining 40 percent. North Carolina, however, pays 85 percent of that amount and requires counties to pay the remaining 15 percent. In fact, North Carolina is the only state that requires counties to share in paying for all Medicaid services.
State figures show that in 2005-06, N.C.’s counties spent almost $426 million on Medicaid. Costs have been rising about 10 percent a year. The counties’ share is expected to be $517 million next year. Edgecombe County’s share this year will be about $5 million.
The increase results from the double-digit growth every year in health care costs and from an increase in the number of people who receive Medicaid. Edgecombe residents receiving Medicaid grew from $2.3 million in 1995-96 to more than 4.7 million in 2005-06. That’s a 104 percent increase in 10 years!
In Edgecombe, Medicaid spending eats up 21 cents of every tax dollar.
Over the last two budget cycles, 62 of North Carolina's 100 counties were forced to rsie property taxes to keep pace with Medicaid increases.
The answer is not to reduce Medicaid coverage for the poor, those permanently disabled and the indigent elderly. Almost 70 percent of those covered are children. Giving them a healthy start in life and helping them develop healthy habits increases the likelihood that they will be productive adults with fewer health care needs in the future. Medicaid also makes it possible for poor, uninsured people to seek care from a doctor before they become acutely sick and end up requiring far more costly care in a hospital emergency room.
Lawmakers recognize the problem counties face but have so far failed to deal with it meaningfully.
Last year, the General Assembly appropriated $27.4 million to cap county costs at the 2005-06 level. But by the end of February, counties had spent nearly $24 million more they had by the end of February 2006, making the amount allocated far from adequate to have the intended purpose.
It’s unlikely that the state could take over the entire amount at one time without either taking a source of revenue from the counties or raising taxes. One option that’s been discussed is taking back half a cent of the sales tax revenue that now goes to counties.
Several lawmakers are trying to find a solution. One option being considered is a 10-year phase out because the state can’t absorb half a billion in Medicaid costs now paid by the counties in “one fell swoop.”
A phase out has many positives. Counties would immediately begin to receive some relief. And, if the state takes on the costs over a period of time, economic growth and the resulting increase in tax revenues could well make it possible to avoid a tradeoff with the counties that would rob them of revenue they need for school construction, social services and other costs.
Whatever alternative is chosen, the General Assembly needs to act this year to relieve counties of a cost that’s sapping their budgets and over which they have no control.
- Opinion
-
- No sandwiches for Edgecombe ABC Board
- ‘Get better everyday'
- Stimulus signs may backfire
- Story was a let down
- Everette-Oates ‘trying her best to improve the town’
- Taxes and myths
-
Come meet Ashley Woolard Saturday
The First Congressional District is ready for a change. A change in leadership, a change in priorities, and a change in attitudes.
The last Republican to represent the First District was Walter Pool in 1883. Our stagnant advancement under the direction of the Democrats is evident that a change is needed. We need jobs and we need businesses to provide those jobs.
G. K. Butterfield is our representative in Washington. It is his duty to represent all members of his district. The people who are struggling to take care of their families, support their churches, and expect the government to represent them are ignored. How has Butterfield benefited his constituents?
He voted to destroy the best health care system in the world, and voted for a bill that he had never read that will cost the taxpayers trillions of dollars. He voted to use taxpayer money to perform abortions in the healthcare bill.
He voted for Cap and Trade that will destroy millions of jobs at a time we need them most. This bill will drive more businesses out of the country. He was appointed to the Helsinki Committee to adopt the U. N. Global standards of environmental policies.
He voted for finance reform that will further restrict businesses and make it more difficult to maintain job growth.
Butterfield is loyal to Nancy Pelosi, and she has appointed him to several important committees. One of which is the House Committee of Standards of Official Conduct. t is their job to censor fellow members for misconduct, but when Charles Rangel was examined by the committee for lying about his taxes he gave Butterfield a thousand-dollar donation and the charges went away.
Ashley Woolard is challenging Butterfield for the right to represent the First District. Mr. Woolard is optimistic that he can defeat Butterfield in November. However, he is realistic and realizes that he needs help. He needs volunteers to get his message to every eligible voter, because every vote is important, but above all he needs money. It will take a lot of money to put a Republican in Washington for the first time in 127 years.
I am sure everyone knows who Butterfield is, but how many of you know Ashley Woolard? If you haven’t met this young man, we invite you to join an Ashley Woolard for Congress meet and greet on Saturday, July 31, from 4 until 7 p.m. at the Macclesfield Community Center, N.C. 124 and Fourth Street. This will also be a chance to donate to the campaign and purchase barbequed chicken plates for dinner.
Don Harrell
Macclesfield -
She doesn’t like traps for cats
I live in Tarboro and some of my neighbors have put out traps for cats. These cats have been here since I have lived here.
We have all kinds of animals here running here and they look good here.
I am unhappy about the way people do things.
What can we do about this?
DEBBIE OWENS
Tarboro - Four-way stop or deadly intersection doesn’t make sense
- Computers, trees and decisions
- More Opinion Headlines
